With the recent death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, questions concerning the nomination of the next Supreme Court Justice have been a significant topic of discussion. According to Article Two of the United States Constitution, the responsibility of nominating a Supreme Court Justice falls on the president. The president typically receives recommendations for the next judge from various federal departments, Congress, and other sitting judges. The president nominates a judge who then faces a series of hearings in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee which votes whether to send the nomination to the Senate. The Senate then confirms or rejects the nominee by a simple majority vote. Interestingly, out of the 159 nominations, the Senate has only rejected 12 candidates. The first rejected nominee was John Rutledge in 1795, and the last rejected nominee was Robert H. Bork in 1987.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment