Skip to main content

What is the archaic language of the poem "Huswifery"?

Take note of how different Edward Taylor's language might seem from how we speak and write in the present day, yet we are still able to understand his poems, such as "Huswifery." Taylor spoke and wrote in a time where much transition and transformation was occurring in the English language. Taylor was born and educated in England but traveled to the Massachusetts Bay Colony as a grown man, and already the language in these two places would have been markedly different. England was still experiencing the aftermath of the Great Vowel Shift, but speakers in the Colonies were encountering a much wider variety of native tongues and accents, all of which have had a part in forming the American accent.


In this transitional period, English was transforming from Middle English (whose pronunciation found much more local particularities) to the more highly standardized Modern English. We call this in-between period Early Modern English. This language is really not so archaic at all, but it does demonstrate how much language can change in the space of three or four centuries.


The title, too, demonstrates the shift in language over time. Huswife is a term dating to at least the 13th century, but by the 18th, language had changed to prefer the pronunciation of housewife as having cleaner moral connotations than the older form.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.