Skip to main content

How do Holling's feelings about Mrs. Baker change from the beginning of the book to the end?

Holling's feelings change from not liking Mrs. Baker at all to Mrs. Baker being his favorite teacher.  


In the beginning of the book, Holling has to stay in Mrs. Baker's classroom on Wednesday afternoons.  He has to do this because he is the only Protestant in a school full of Catholic students and Jewish students.  On Wednesday afternoons, both of those groups go to their respective religious studies classes.  


Neither Mrs. Baker nor Holling is pleased about the Wednesday afternoon arrangement.  Mrs. Baker starts off the first month by requiring Holling to do menial tasks like clean desks and chalkboard erasers.  Holling actually thinks that Mrs. Baker hates him.  In October, Mrs. Baker decides that the two of them will study Shakespeare together.  That's when Holling really believes that she hates him; however, over the course of the school year, Holling realizes that he likes both Shakespeare and Mrs. Baker.  He comes to see her as a person that wants the best for him.  This is evidenced from things she does for Holling like drive him to the professional baseball game when his dad forgets to pick him up.  She also arranges for Holling and a friend to play baseball with a couple of the Yankees baseball players.  By the end of the novel, Holling's feelings about Mrs. Baker have completely turned around.  He no longer sees her as an enemy.  He sees her as a friend, confidant, counselor, and wonderful teacher.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more