Skip to main content

What is metaphysical about "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning?" What parts of the poem lead you to your answers?

The Metaphysical Poets were known for their use of extended metaphors (conceits). While some poets associated with this group did address subjects and ideas that we would call metaphysical ("above" the physical) or spiritual, this was not necessarily the case. 


But in this poem, Donne does use the extended metaphor and he also mentions metaphysical notions. In this poem, the speaker tells his beloved that she should not mourn his death because their love is at a spiritual (metaphysical) level. The speaker even mocks those whose love is merely earthly, physical, or "sublunary." 



Dull sublunary lovers' love 


(Whose soul is sense) cannot admit 


Absence, because it doth remove 


Those things which elemented it. 



In other words, anyone who does not understand the soul in the spiritual sense, cannot bear to lose a loved one. If he/she does not understand love in the spiritual sense, he/she will not understand that this kind of love is unaffected by death. This is the general message of the poem. The speaker tells his loved one not to mourn his death because their love is metaphysical/spiritual. Death can not affect it. 


He adds that death is not a separation, but an "expansion" of their love. Then, he uses the extended metaphor of two compasses which move in unison. They are inextricably linked. This metaphor parallels their inextricably linked spiritual love. (This linkage also seems like a prescient description of quantum entanglement. This is when two particles are linked and neither time nor space can sever that link.) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.