Skip to main content

What actions demonstrate Mrs. Jones's confidence in the short story "Thank You, M'am"?

You will find several examples of textual evidence demonstrating Mrs. Jones’s confidence in Langston Hughes's short story “Thank You, M’am.”


In the exposition, Roger is unsuccessful in his attempt to steal Mrs. Jones's rather cumbersome pocketbook. Instead of running away or screaming for help, the self-assured Mrs. Jones gives him a swift kick and lifts him up by his shirt collar so she can confront him. In no uncertain terms, Mrs. Jones tells Roger she is bothered by his actions; she questions him and informs him in a pretty unforgettable way.



But the boy’s weight and the weight of the purse combined caused him to lose his balance so, instead of taking off full blast as he had hoped, the boy fell on his back on the sidewalk, and his legs flew up. The large woman simply turned around and kicked him right square in his blue-jeaned sitter. Then she reached down, picked the boy up by his shirt front, and shook him until his teeth rattled.



Mrs. Jones's action of taking the errant boy into her home is another demonstration of confidence. Instead of calling the police after the initial confrontation, she drags him to her room, where she demonstrates respect for the boy’s situation by having him clean up, feeding him, and engaging him in conversation in which she alludes to details of her early life.



“I have done things, too, which I would not tell you, son—neither tell God, if he didn’t already know. So you set down while I fix us something to eat. You might run that comb through your hair so you will look presentable.”



She is so confident her treatment of Roger will influence his decisions that she leaves her pocketbook on the daybed while she turns away from him to cook dinner. At this point, Roger realizes he wants Mrs. Jones to trust him.


By being empathetic to Roger’s situation and showing him respect without demeaning him or his situation, Mrs. Jones demonstrates her self-confidence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.