Skip to main content

What is the role of the human gallbladder with respect to weight management?

The human gallbladder is a small sack-like organ that is attached to the liver. Its function is to store a greenish yellow liquid called bile. Bile is an essential part of the digestive system—it emulsifies fats and allows them to be absorbed as energy more easily. 


A human can function without a gallbladder. A cholecystectomy is a surgery in which the gallbladder is removed. The gallbladder may be removed for many different reasons, including tumors, gallstones, or gallbladder disease.


Without the gallbladder, a person will not be able to break down fats as easily. Normally, the gallbladder would collect, store and concentrate bile, releasing that bile when a person eats fatty foods. Without the gallbladder, a person still gets bile from the liver, but the bile enters directly into the intestines without becoming concentrated. Without the gallbladder, nutritional deficiencies may develop as a result of the body's inability to digest fat efficiently. When there are large nutritional deficiencies, the body responds by clinging to stores of fat and nutrients. This may result in weight gain because the body's response is to hold on to fats. 


The deficiency of certain nutrients causes the body to aggressively store fat, which can certainly result in weight gain. Weight gain is of course a function of several factors, including diet, exercise, and muscle mass. A 1984 British study reported that 87% of men and 68% of women experienced weight gain after cholecystectomy. There is a relationship between gallbladder removal and weight gain. To counteract this effect, cholecystectomy patients can work to maintain a diet that is not nutritionally deficient so that a storage response is not activated within the body.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more