Skip to main content

How do images signify the literal and symbolic importance of objects to the development of the plot in "The Scarlet Ibis?"

The bleeding tree is a striking image because it bleeds sap and this symbolically foreshadows Doodle's death. The scarlet ibis brings even more symbolic clarity to this first comparison. The ibis is actually (literally) red and in this story, this is certainly symbolic of blood. The bleeding tree and the blood red color of the ibis all symbolize Doodle's blood at the end of the story. Despite Doodle's progress (at the hands of Brother's selfish motivation), these morbid images keep emerging.


Doodle's coffin is also an image that literally and symbolically refers to death. Doodle's father had it made when he was born, thinking he would not survive. Doodle survives, but they keep the coffin. Brother cruelly torments him the coffin, making sure he knows it was made for him.


Even after Doodle survives his infancy and learns to walk, the family keeps the coffin. "Within a few months Doodle had learned to walk well and his go-cart was put up in the barn loft (it's still there) beside his little mahogany coffin." That image of death is literally and symbolically still there. Between the bleeding tree, the scarlet ibis, and the coffin, the story constantly uses images to foreshadow blood and death.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.