Skip to main content

What fears do Friar Laurence express in Act II, Scene 6?

Friar Laurence is expressing fears that the couple are rushing into marriage based on intense feelings that will not last.


Romeo has just made an extravagant pronouncement -- no future sorrow can outweigh the joy he feels during a single moment in Juliet's presence. In a foreshadowing of later tragedy, he says he is ready to die if necessary ("love-devouring death do what he dare") if only he can marry Juliet first.


Thus the friar (who is an older, more circumspect person) is fearful that this will be a fiery, short-lived passion. He  responds by warning Romeo about hot-headed, overly passionate love:



"These violent delights have violent ends
And in their triumph die, like fire and powder,
Which as they kiss consume: the sweetest honey
Is loathsome in his own deliciousness
And in the taste confounds the appetite:
Therefore love moderately; long love doth so;
Too swift arrives as tardy as too slow."



When fire and powder come together, they explode. So too may Romeo's passions ("violent delights") explode and fizzle out once he gets what he wants. Gratifying Romeo's intense feelings may be like eating over-sweet honey. It's too much intensity; it will become unsatisfying or aversive. Friar Laurence is advising Romeo to be less intense in his love. A more moderate, sedate love will last longer.


But Laurence doesn't seriously expect Romeo to delay the marriage, and his other fear is that the lovers will engage in pre-marital sexual activity. So he urges them to come with him and make "quick work" of the wedding.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more