Skip to main content

conjunctions - Can I use "lest" in the following sentence?


I am not a native English speaker/writer, but I am working on a technical thesis written in English. To me, for some unknown reason, it feels natural to write the following:



However, the simplicity of the theory implies that it is not possible in reality, lest someone would surely have already done it.



Googling for the definition of lest seems to imply that this is not a correct usage.


So, can I use lest like I do, and if not, do any of you also feel there is any merit to my spontaneous feeling that it actually is ok to use it here? The first answer of this post (Is this usage of "lest" possible?) seems to support my case, but i am not sure.



Answer



Two things.




  1. Lest is always followed by the subjunctive mood. ODO's example is



    he spent whole days in his room, wearing headphones lest he disturb anyone



    Your example doesn't do this, nor can it.




  2. Lest is a conjunction and means "to avoid the risk of" (ODO), and generally that phrase can be slotted in, adjusting the verb from the subjunctive mood:



    he spent whole days in his room, wearing headphones to avoid the risk of disturbing anyone



    Your example doesn't seem to be able to have this phrase inserted.




I think that what your sentence is intended to mean is



However, the simplicity of the theory implies that it is not possible in reality, or else someone would surely have already done it.



Another way of putting that would be to use otherwise. You are stating how that theory is proved (that is, it's supportive corroboration); you're not stating how a risk might be avoided (a negative result).


The confusion might be because ODO's example could also use otherwise:



he spent whole days in his room wearing headphones, otherwise he might have disturbed someone



However, this doesn't mean that otherwise and lest are generally interchangeable. To determine which to use, substitute either to avoid the risk of or or else.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more