Skip to main content

word choice - "It was from that moment where" vs. "it was from that moment when"



Now that I think about it, it was from that moment where I started to have doubts about him.



Would it be better to use the word "when" instead of "where," or are they both equally valid word choices? Is there any difference at all?



Answer



It should be:



Now that I think about it, it was from that moment that I started to have doubts about him.



It sounds a bit awkward with all those thats, but "that" is grammatically correct. It might read better this way:



Now that I think about it, that was the moment when I started to have doubts about him.



Or better yet:



That was the moment when I started to doubt him.



I'm not sure if where or when would be incorrect grammatically speaking, but either would be confusingly redundant, as they serve essentially the same purpose as the prepositional phrase from that moment -- i.e., to specify a point in time. Thus, if I hear the sentence with either when or where in the place of that, it sets an expectation that it refers to yet another point in time at which something else happened after you started to have doubts, e.g.:



...it was from that moment when I started to have doubts about him that I began trying to hack into his e-mail account to see if he was cheating.



In short, if you use when or where, the thought feels unfinished to this American English speaker.


That, on the other hand, serves as a conjunction introducing the subordinate clause "I started to have doubts about him." Thus, it completes a thought.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more