Skip to main content

grammaticality - Is it correct to use "me too" and "I too"?


I'm a bit confused. Is it correct to use "me too" and "I too"? (Also with other pronouns.)


For example, if I want to say that Juan gives a present to Ana and I give a present to Ana:



Juan gives a present to Ana, [me/I] too.



Or if I want to say that Juan gives a present to Ana and Pedro gives a present to Ana:



Juan gives a present to Ana, [him/he] too.




Answer



When I write, I would not use any of these “[pronoun] too,” and I would write



Juan gives a present to Ana, and so do I.


Juan gives a present to Ana, and so does he.



When speaking informally, I may say



Juan gives a present to Ana, and me too.



but this is ambiguous because “me too” can mean both “I give a present to Ana, too” and “Juan gives a present to me, too.” I would never use “I too” in the informal context.


(By the way, all of these examples have a separate issue: using the simple present sounds strange because it implies Juan, Pedro or I give a present to Ana routinely.)


(Added: Kosmonaut pointed out in a comment that the simple present is used also when you are narrating the situation (thanks!). That is a more plausible context in which these sentences are used than people give a present routinely. See Kosmonaut’s comment to this answer.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.