Skip to main content

philosophy - Words for the scalability and lack thereof of object properties


All the objects are red, so the group is red.


All the objects are small, but the group is not small.


Color is ___, while size is ___ .


I'm trying to remember the words for this distinction regarding properties and collections, but I am struggling to do so. The words are most frequently encountered in philosophy, I believe.



Answer



Materials and systems have what are called intensive and extensive properties. From Wikipedia:



Physical properties of materials and systems can often be categorized as being either intensive or extensive quantities, according to how the property changes when the size (or extent) of the system changes. According to IUPAC, an intensive property is one whose magnitude is independent of the size of the system. An extensive property is one whose magnitude is additive for subsystems.


An intensive property is a bulk property, meaning that it is a physical property of a system that does not depend on the system size or the amount of material in the system. Examples of intensive properties include temperature, T, refractive index, n, density, ρ, and hardness of an object, η (IUPAC symbols[1] are used throughout this article). When a diamond is cut, the pieces maintain their intrinsic hardness (until their size reaches a few atoms thick), so hardness is independent of the size of the system.


By contrast, an extensive property is additive for subsystems. This means the system could be divided into any number of subsystems, and the extensive property measured for each subsystem; the value of the property for the system would be the sum of the property for each subsystem. For example, both the mass, m, and the volume, V, of a diamond are directly proportional to the amount that is left after cutting it from the raw mineral. Mass and volume are extensive properties, but hardness is intensive....


The terms intensive and extensive quantities were introduced by Richard C. Tolman in 1917....


Examples of intensive properties include:


chemical potential, μ / color / concentration, c / density, ρ (or specific gravity) / magnetic permeability, μ / melting point and boiling point / molality, m or b / pressure, p / specific heat capacity, cp / specific volume, v / standard reduction potential, E° / temperature, T...


Examples of extensive properties include:


amount of substance, mol / energy, E / enthalpy, H / entropy, S / Gibbs energy, G / heat capacity, Cp / Helmholtz energy, A or F / internal energy, U / mass, m / volume, V



(bolding mine). 'Number of elements in a set' is obviously an extensive quantity.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.