Skip to main content

single word requests - 'Yet' is to 'already' as what is to 'eventually'? Could 'never' do?


I don't know if my title serves well in expressing what I am actually trying to ask, so maybe an example will do better:



I have done it already. <-> I have not done it yet.


I waited patiently, and he eventually returned. <-> I waited patiently, but he didn't ??? return.



My non-native-English-speaking intuition tells me that the same word eventually wouldn't be appropriate in the negative sentence, the same way as already wouldn't in the first example. Is there any truth in this? Assuming there is, I would normally use never + Past Indefinite to express the "opposite"1 of eventually



I waited patiently, and he eventually returned. <-> I waited patiently, but he never returned.



However, I started having doubts whether this usage of never expresses what I used to assume it did, the reason being that I was unable to find this meaning of never in the dictionary (I checked Dictionary.com and Merriam-Webster). According to Dictionary.com:



never can be used instead of not with the simple past tenses of certain verbs for emphasis ( I never said that; I never realized how clever he was ), but this usage should be avoided in serious writing



So, even if never is the word I am looking for (which according to the definition above it is not), it's said to be informal.


I am hoping someone could point to the word I am looking for, if there exists one, and also throw some light on this usage of never (for example, which "certain verbs" is Dictionary.com referring to? Does my example sentence sound natural?)



1 What is 'yet' to 'already', by the way? Is there a special term?



Answer



Ever is the word you're looking for. Both ever and yet, along with any, are Negative Polarity Items.
In fact, ever is suppletion for *anywhen, which is not allowed in English, although anywhere is.


It isn't never, which is a negative trigger itself, not a polarity item.


Since an NPI can only occur in the scope of a semantic negative, it's the not in have not done it that licenses yet; it would be ungrammatical if there were no negative.



  • I have not done it yet (grammatical)

  • *I have done it yet (ungrammatical)


Similarly,



  • I waited patiently, but he didn't ever return.

  • *I waited patiently, but he ever returned.


Negative polarity items are all idiomatic and often have very strange syntax. When you encounter something strange in English grammar, look around to see if there's some negative word or construction that's causing a disruption.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more