Skip to main content

How did WW2 change the role of women? How did this change views of sex and "proper" roles" How does this relate to us today?...

During World War II, many women left the home and went to work in numbers that were unprecedented. Whereas about twelve million women were in the workforce before the attack upon Pearl Harbor, after the United States entered war, six million more women left the home to work in place of the men who were drafted.


Many of the women who had jobs simply retained them at a higher rate of pay because their employers wanted to keep them. But other women were enlisted in the work force as they went to work at manufacturing plants, becoming active in the war effort. Also, during previous wars, the role of women in the military was limited to nursing; however, with World War II, there were many women who enlisted and performed various roles. In 1948 the Women's Armed Services Integration Act recognized women as a permanent part of the armed forces. This Act led to more equality for women in the military.
Not all was positive, however. There were African-Americans who became involved with the military either as servicemen or women as workers. But, because the military was segregated, these people were subjected to discrimination.


After World War II, many women returned to their roles as homemakers as their husbands returned home, and they started families or had another child during what is called "The Baby Boom." Nevertheless, women who served in the military and in the workforce certainly challenged social norms and gave women a new perspective upon their opportunities. 


Some women profited from their war-time experience in opportunities and in feelings of self-worth. For instance, Maggie Gee, who is now 84 and a retired physicist who grew up in Berkeley, California. Ms. Gee was one of two Chinese-American women who flew airplanes in the military while she was an Air Force Service Pilot.



"I think it changed the dynamic - and gave women confidence that they could earn a living," she says of the war. "You didn't have to be dependent on the male. Being a housewife is an honorable job. But with women who were out in the world, they didn't feel subservient to the man anymore."



Clearly, many women who entered the workforce in WWII had positive experiences that gave them self-confidence and greater opportunities that they provided them hope for in any other situation of the time. Truly, there is no doubt that during and after WWII, there were opportunities opened in careers hitherto closed to women. These opportunities led, in turn, to more opportunities and challenges to stereotypical gender roles.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.