Nick describes Gatsby as possessing a certain kind of innocence, a goodness that granted Gatsby a "heightened sensitivity to the promises of life." Despite all the times life had been unfair to Gatsby, he had faith he could get all the things that he wanted—riches, Daisy, happiness—and he never seemed to lose a sincere and genuine hope that he could have it all. This kind of optimism is what sets Jay Gatsby apart from everyone else in the novel. Jordan is a pessimist and liar, and although Nick is attracted to her, he recognizes her fundamental elitism and dishonesty. Tom and Daisy Buchanan are, ultimately, "careless people" who can basically do whatever terrible things they want and get away with them because they can always disappear into their status and riches. Gatsby is a far better person than they (despite his illegal business activities). He seems to be exempt from Nick's negative judgment because of his fundamental goodness, something most of the other characters seem to lack.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment