Spain was hoping to enhance its wealth from the voyage of Christopher Columbus. The crown wanted to chart a western route to India and the lucrative spice and luxury goods trade. The Portuguese had already charted a route around the southern part of Africa and held a monopoly in that direction. Columbus convinced Spain that a western route could be charted. Queen Isabella agreed to fund an expedition in the hopes that Spain could map out a new path to the eastern markets. Once the Spanish realized that the lands Columbus sailed to were "unclaimed" territories, they wished to secure colonies that would enrich them with resources and markets. The Spanish also wished to convert the native peoples to Christianity which would grow the power of the Roman Catholic Church.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment