Skip to main content

What role does Antony play in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar? Why is Antony significant?

Mark Antony is the pivotal character in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. His great funeral oration in the third act turns everything around. Up to that point the conspirators are on the offensive. They are just about to take over the governing of Rome, with Brutus and Cassius in the leading positions of power. But, just as recorded in history by Plutarch, Antony displays both remarkable courage and surprising eloquence as he single-handedly arouses the Roman plebeians to mutiny against Julius Caesar's assassins and forces them to flee from the city. At the end of Act III, Scene 2, a Servant tells Antony that Octavius has arrived in Rome and adds:



I heard him say, Brutus and Cassius
Are rid like madmen through the gates of Rome.



From that point on Antony is the most powerful man in the empire. Octavius is still quite young. It will take him some time to free himself from dependence upon Antony''s superior sagacity and experience. Lepidus, the third member of their  triumvirate, is a relative nonentity who will eventually be disposed of in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra. 


Brutus and Cassius are at a disadvantage in their conflict with Antony and Octavius because the two leading conspirators are forced to camp and forage in the hinterlands while Antony and Octavius are firmly ensconced in the power base of Rome. Under Antony's experienced generalship, he and Octavius defeat the armies of Brutus and Cassius at the battle of Philippi, and Antony has secured the rulership of the Roman Empire to be divided between himself and Augustus. Eventually Augustus becomes the first of a long line of emperors, something that never could have happened without the courage and brilliance of Mark Antony. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more