Skip to main content

In the book Hatchet, why does Brian refer to the time after he tries to kill himself as "new time"?

Brian refers to that shift in his life and attitude as "new time" because the shift is a complete turn in Brian's attitude about his situation. People talk about the idea of "turning over a new leaf." It's usually about some habit change that they want to make; however, Brian literally has a completely new outlook on his life.


Before the "new time," Brian's main hope for survival was rescue. As the days ticked by, Brian got hungrier and weaker. Every day he wasn't rescued was another day of lost hope. The new time isn't a time of losing hope. It is a time of Brian having increased hope in his survival. The difference is that Brian knows that his survival is not dependent on somebody else rescuing him. His survival depends on his own ability to avoid costly mistakes and secure himself food.



But hope in his knowledge. Hope in the fact that he could learn and survive and take care of himself. Tough hope, he thought that night. I am full of tough hope.



The "new time" is about Brian's new attitude toward seizing control of his own survival.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.