History is very significant to modern life. For example, it teaches one to read critically and to use media sources in a discerning manner. Also, history teaches lessons about contemporary social and political life. People look at the American presidential election of 2016 and compare it to the election of 1912 when the Republican party split. There are also lessons to be learned from America's growing divide between rich and poor and the social changes and revolutions that took place throughout history because of this divide. History also provides inspiration in looking at the lives of great people, such as Harriet Tubman and George Washington. History gives one a sense of perspective. In the media, people often throw out the word "unprecedented" a great deal but a careful study of history shows that many of these events do have some precedent. History may not always repeat, but it certainly rhymes.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment