Skip to main content

how can theories X and Y be differentiated for maslow's hierarchy of needs?

Theory X is a theory of human motivation developed by Douglas McGregor that argues that the use of strict supervision, with behavior-based rewards and penalties, is the best motivating factor. Theory Y, also created by McGregor, posits that job satisfaction is the best motivator and promotes unsupervised work environments. Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a theory created by Abraham Maslow that ranks the different levels of human need. The aspects of this hierarchy, from most to least necessary, are: physiological needs, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization.

These theories can be compared in that they explain human motivation on some level. However, Theory X and Theory Y explain motivation to succeed in the workplace specifically, while Maslow's hierarchy of needs explains motivation in terms of how people prioritize meeting their needs. Maslow's theory focuses on the development of motivation based on which types of needs are being met, and McGregor's theories examine motivation in a specific context with different environments.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more