Skip to main content

What is the climax of "The Bread" by Wolfgang Borchert? The anti-climax? What point of view does the author use in the story? What is the point of...

Wolfgang Borchert's short story "The Bread" ("Das Brot") focuses on an incident in the lives of a married couple living in post-World War Two Germany and how that incident naturalistically reflects the realities of living after war.


The rising action of the story occurs when the wife suddenly wakes up at 2:30 AM because she hears a noise coming from the kitchen—perhaps the sound of someone bumping against a chair. She discovers that her husband is not in bed with her and hurries down into the dark kitchen to see what has caused the disturbance.


The climax occurs when the wife discovers that her husband snuck down to the kitchen to cut himself an extra slice of their rationed bread. The wife does not attack him for this deception, but instead convinces him to come back to bed and listens to him chew the bread while she tries to fall asleep.


The falling action occurs the next evening at dinner. The wife gives her husband four slices of bread instead of the rationed three slices, taking only two slices for herself. She notes that she feels sorry for him, but makes sure not to make the act seem like one of pity.


The story is told from a third person point of view, but includes dialogue spoken in the first person. This choice consciously helps the reader get critical distance from the event and allows us to omnisciently understand the thoughts of both the husband and wife. For example, when the wife stumbles upon her husband cutting himself bread in the kitchen, we may equally discover that she believes he looks "pretty old" in his night shirt and that he believes she looks "pretty old" due to her "hair at night."


We are able to contextualize the point of the story through this distance: that suffering and empathy walk hand-in-hand. Rather than punish her husband for taking what is not his or demanding that he make reparations for what he did, the woman chooses to provide comfort to him by playing along with his lie about why he came down to the kitchen. Additionally, she acts out of even greater compassion by giving up part of her portion of the dinner's bread to him and pretending she is doing so simply because it doesn't "agree" with her. She elects to suffer on his behalf, despite the fact that she is troubled by this lie. It is a radical act of kindness in a country that has been steeped in the midst of wartime atrocity and crises. It is also a deeply ironic one, given that Germany was instrumental in enacting those atrocities.


Ultimately, the clinical, almost detached nature with which this tale is told is unnerving—a gesture toward the truth that this kind of starvation and deprivation was commonplace in Germany after the war. Germany was provided with very little relief from the Allied forces from mid-1945 to mid-1947, despite the fact that food production had been severely impacted by the war. The food that was received from America was of low nutritional value, composed of substandard ingredients, and scarce. This knowledge makes the wife's small act of sacrifice all the more powerful.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more