Skip to main content

What are three reasons why many Maycomb citizens do not want to serve on the jury?

In Chapter 23, Jem voices his frustration regarding the Tom Robinson trial. During the conversation, he wonders aloud why Maycomb residents don't sit on juries.


Atticus responds that there are three reasons for this. First, he states that most people in Maycomb aren't interested in serving on juries. Second, he states that some Maycomb residents are afraid of the consequences of serving on one.


Atticus provides an example to explain the second reason. He states that businessmen like Link Deas would find it difficult to decide on cases that could potentially involve regular Maycomb customers he will have to face on a daily basis. If Link serves on a jury, he may find himself offending a customer, and his business may suffer. Fear is a very powerful deterrent against serving on a jury in a town like Maycomb.


Third, Atticus states that "Serving on a jury forces a man to make up his mind and declare himself about something. Men don’t like to do that. Sometimes it’s unpleasant." Here, Atticus suggests that those who serve on juries will eventually have to face their own biases candidly, and this can be a very difficult thing to do.


Although jury votes are supposed to be secret, word often gets out on how cases are decided. This has the potential to expose how individual jurors voted on specific cases. Sometimes, this can be a positive development; at other times, because individual jurors may be ambivalent about their own stances, exposure can lead to embarrassment and possible ridicule. The second and third reasons have to do with fear of exposure and having to face the ugliness inherent in the human soul.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more