Skip to main content

What is the chemical test for alkanes and alkenes?

Alkanes and alkenes are both hydrocarbons. Alkanes, however, contain only single bonds between the carbons while alkenes contain at least one double bond between carbons. Tests can be conducted to differentiate these two groups of molecules based on whether or not the double bonds can be broken by a halogen.


If one takes two test tubes with bromine water and adds an alkene to tube A and an alkane to tube B and then shakes the two tubes, a color change will occur in tube A (the color of the solution will change from brown to colorless) while no color change will occur in tube B. This is because in tube A, the double bond is broken and the carbons become halogenated while no reaction occurs in tube B.


The reaction that occurs in tube A is as follows:


Bromine is a diatomic element. It regularly occurs as Br2. In a molecule of Br2 one bromine has a partial positive charge and the other has a partial negative charge. It only becomes polarized as it approaches the electron-dense double bond of the alkene.


The electrophilic bromine attacks the double bond and a bond is formed between one of the carbons involved in the double bond and the electrophilic bromine. The other bromine is a good leaving group and leaves as a bromine ion.  


This leaves the former alkene as a carbo-cation; there is a positive charge on the carbon that now only has three bonds (due to the breaking of the double bond). This is an unstable intermediate, but the positive carbon is then attacked by the negative bromine ion and a bond is formed. The resulting product is 1,2-dibromoethane which is colorless while diatomic bromine is dark red/brown.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more