After the Transcontinental Railroad was completed in 1869, the trip from New York to California became much shorter. The trip took about a week, while before the railroad was built, travelers had to make a long and dangerous journey across the ocean and across Panama. The shipping of goods from coast to coast became much faster and far less expensive, and trade across the continent greatly increased. For example, a decade after the railroad opened, freight worth $50 million was transported on the railroad from coast to coast each year. Producers on the west coast could now have access to markets in the east, and those in the east could ship products west. In addition, products from the middle of the country were developed and brought to market. In addition, the railroad facilitated westward expansion and the growth of industrial centers in the west.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment