Skip to main content

How is Aunt Alexandra different in Part One and Part Two of the book?

In Part One of To Kill a Mockingbird, Scout does not see her aunt much.  She views her as a distant person.  Aunt Alexandra rarely comes to visit Scout and her family in Maycomb.  Scout reveals how she feels about Aunt Alexandra:



... throughout my early life, she was cold and there (Chapter 9).



Aunt Alexandra is portrayed as being strict, critical, and full of unwanted advice in Part One.  She is concerned that Scout is not ladylike:



Aunt Alexandra was fanatical on the subject of my attire.  I could not possibly hope to be a lady if I wore breeches; when I said I could do nothing in a dress, she said I wasn't supposed to be doing things that required pants.  Aunt Alexandra's vision of my deportment involved playing with small stoves, tea sets, and wearing the Add-A-Pearl necklace she gave me when I was born; furthermore, I should be a ray of sunshine in my father’s lonely life.



Chapter 12 is the first chapter in Part Two.  Aunt Alexandra's presence increases dramatically in Part Two.  In Chapter 12, Scout and Jem come home to find their aunt sitting on the porch.  


Scout and Jem soon find out that Aunt Alexandra is moving into their house.  She is going to stay throughout the trial.  Scout begins to see Aunt Alexandra as a person with feelings and more warmth than she knew before.  She is still strict and serious but Scout begins to understand her aunt.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more