Skip to main content

Would A Midsummer Night's Dream have worked as a play without the Rude Mechanicals? What is the purpose of their inclusion?

A Midsummer Night’s Dream follows several threads which sometimes intertwine. The four lovers, the fairies, and the rude mechanicals are the three main storylines. The rude mechanicals are less essential to the plot than the other two. Without them, only a few adjustments would have to be made to keep the story together. The play would also be darker and more serious. However, the players add a delightful levity to the comedy and provide the other characters with much entertainment.


The commoners counterbalance the story’s noble fairies, lovers, and leaders. These men are actors by night and tradesmen by day. They speak in prose rather than verse, except when they recite lines from their terrible play Pyramus and Thisby. The egoistic Bottom, who wishes to perform all the roles, plays a part in the fairy king’s humiliation of the fairy queen Titania. Puck turns his head into a donkey’s, frightening the other mortals and adding to Midsummer’s fantastical qualities. Bewitched by a love potion, Titania hears his presumably wretched singing and declares, “What angel wakes me from my flowery bed?” She woos him, and when he awakes, he believes the whole experience was a dream.


Bottom serves as the play’s buffoonish clown, and their performance before the aristocrats fulfills the theatrical trope of a play within a play. The rude mechanicals contribute to and enhance the roles of other characters, but they are also an engrossing plotline in their own right. The audience laughs at and empathizes with their fears and triumphs, however silly. Midsummer would survive without them, but it would not have the same charm.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more