Skip to main content

In the story "Thank you, M'am," why does Roger sit so that Mrs. Jones can see him?

In the short story, “Thank you, M’am,” Langston Hughes tells us exactly why Roger sits in such a way that Mrs. Jones can see him.  Hughes tells us that Roger “did not want to be mistrusted now.”  He sits so that Mrs. Jones can see him so that she will know that she can trust him.  This is important to the story as it shows that Roger has come to care about what Mrs. Jones thinks of him.


“Thank you, M’am” is a story about how we can be affected by how people think of us.  It is a story about how one person’s opinion can matter tremendously to another person, particularly if the other person has not had many/any people truly care about him.  Roger does not appear to have anyone in his life who cares about him.  There is no one at his house to feed him or make sure his face is clean.  Perhaps because of this, he goes out and commits petty crimes.  When he tries to snatch Mrs. Jones’ purse, she stops him and drags him home with her.


As the story goes on, Mrs. Jones shows that she trusts Roger and Roger desperately wants to be worthy of that trust.  He wants someone to have a good opinion of him.  Mrs. Jones seems to know this.  She deliberately leaves her purse where he can get it and does not watch him to be sure he does not take it and run off.  She is showing him some amount of trust.  Once she does this, Roger wants more.  He wants to continue to be trusted.  Therefore, he is careful to sit where she can still see him.  For the first time in his life, someone who matters is treating him with trust and respect.  He wants this to continue, which is why he sits so that she can see him.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more