Skip to main content

What might the man's warning to Eckels foreshadow?

Eckels is warned several times during this story.  I'm not 100% sure which warning the question is referring too.  It doesn't really matter though.  Each warning to Eckels foreshadows the same thing.  They foreshadow that Eckels is going to get scared and ruin the present/future.  The first warning to Eckels is that the trip is dangerous.  It's so dangerous, he might not come back alive. 



"Does this safari guarantee I come back alive?"


"We guarantee nothing," said the official, "except the dinosaurs."



The second warning to Eckels is more official.  The warning this time is a signed release document.  The document is meant to force customers into making sure that they are fully committed to the dinosaur hunt.  People who are not mentally ready tend to panic.  



"Sign this release. Anything happens to you, we're not responsible. Those dinosaurs are hungry."


Eckels flushed angrily. "Trying to scare me!"


"Frankly, yes. We don't want anyone going who'll panic at the first shot."



The warning foreshadows exactly what happens to Eckels.  He panics so badly that he can't control where he is walking.  


The third warning deals with where Eckels is going to end up walking.  The safari customers are specifically told about staying on the path.  It is strongly emphasized to not leave the path.  Leaving the path might lead to irrevocable changes in the timeline.  



"Its purpose is to keep you from touching this world of the past in any way. Stay on the Path. Don't go off it. I repeat. Don't go off. For any reason!"



Those three warnings all foreshadow Eckels's disastrous encounter with the dinosaur.  Eckels realizes that the dinosaur is the most dangerous animal that he has ever faced.  Next, he panics.  His panic then leads him to step off of the path and kill a butterfly, which causes an entire societal and governmental change in the present.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more