Skip to main content

How is the theme of individualism portrayed in Shakespeare's Hamlet and Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre (without including quotations)?

Hamlet struggles in the play to express his individuality, or his sense of himself. He is in many ways an intellectual who is devoted to his studies, but he is forced, by dint of events beyond his control, to give up the life of a scholar that he has formerly led and to devote himself to avenging his father's death at the hands of Hamlet's uncle, Claudius. In his famous soliloquy that begins with "to be or not to be," Hamlet struggles with the question of how to live life. In living life, he has to give up a great deal of himself and his individuality and submit himself to the vicissitudes of fortune. In so doing, his individuality is often erased; however, the only other alternative is death, which is the ultimate destroyer of individuality. In Hamlet's quest to live an authentic life and express his individuality, he is often defeated.


Jane Eyre is more successful at expressing her individuality, or her self-worth and her right to live the life she wants. She continually fights for the way she wants to live. For example, she defies Master John Reed when she is just a girl. When he flings a book at her, she fights back with words, and she refuses to be intimidated by a person who is her superior by dint of his gender and class status. Later, she is able to express to Mr. Rochester the type of relationship that she wants; she refuses to accept his proposal of marriage, even though she loves him, because he is still married to Bertha. Jane only accepts Rochester when he is free to marry, and she marries him very much as an equal. Throughout her life, Jane expresses her desires and wants with a sense of her self-worth, even though she lives in a society that demeans her as a woman without means. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...