Skip to main content

How is the theme of individualism portrayed in Shakespeare's Hamlet and Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre (without including quotations)?

Hamlet struggles in the play to express his individuality, or his sense of himself. He is in many ways an intellectual who is devoted to his studies, but he is forced, by dint of events beyond his control, to give up the life of a scholar that he has formerly led and to devote himself to avenging his father's death at the hands of Hamlet's uncle, Claudius. In his famous soliloquy that begins with "to be or not to be," Hamlet struggles with the question of how to live life. In living life, he has to give up a great deal of himself and his individuality and submit himself to the vicissitudes of fortune. In so doing, his individuality is often erased; however, the only other alternative is death, which is the ultimate destroyer of individuality. In Hamlet's quest to live an authentic life and express his individuality, he is often defeated.


Jane Eyre is more successful at expressing her individuality, or her self-worth and her right to live the life she wants. She continually fights for the way she wants to live. For example, she defies Master John Reed when she is just a girl. When he flings a book at her, she fights back with words, and she refuses to be intimidated by a person who is her superior by dint of his gender and class status. Later, she is able to express to Mr. Rochester the type of relationship that she wants; she refuses to accept his proposal of marriage, even though she loves him, because he is still married to Bertha. Jane only accepts Rochester when he is free to marry, and she marries him very much as an equal. Throughout her life, Jane expresses her desires and wants with a sense of her self-worth, even though she lives in a society that demeans her as a woman without means. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.