Skip to main content

In Wordsworth's "The Solitary Reaper," what deductions does the traveller make about the subject of the song?

One of the most interesting things about this poem is that the narrator never quite pinpoints the central meaning of the solitary reaper's song. First, the narrator imagines the song has whisked him off to distant, exotic lands. Shortly after this optimistic daydream, however, the speaker wonders whether the singer is harkening back to some kind of melancholy sadness. While the narrator never definitively resolves what the song "means," he does deduce there is a sense of endlessness, an inherent, eternal beauty that pervades the song's subject. As such, the narrator's deductions about the song's subject lead to one of the poem's most important themes—even the most common, average things (such as a solitary reaper singing in a field) have the ability to illustrate an important, eternal beauty that lies just beyond the grasp of human comprehension but is nonetheless of vital importance. By the end of the poem, it is this beautiful endlessness that becomes the song's subject. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.