Photosynthesis is important, in fact essential, to all life for a number of reasons. First, it makes it possible for plants to survive. Since almost the entire food chain depends on plant matter either directly or indirectly, life as we know it would come to an end without photosynthesis--with very few exceptions, both herbivores (animals that consume plants) and carnivores (animals that consume other animals) would starve. Only very simple life forms could live. Photosynthesis is important for another reason. It is a chemical reaction that uses carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, water, and light to create sugars that nourish plants. But it also produces oxygen, which is essential to almost all life. Because of photosynthesis, plants essentially function as filters that take carbon dioxide, which is poisonous to humans and many other life forms, from the atmosphere and replace it with oxygen, which makes life possible.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment