Skip to main content

Why is Algernon so important in "Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes?

In "Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes, Algernon is very important because Charlie follows in his footsteps. The intelligence experiments Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss are performing on Charlie were first used on Algernon. In scientific research, mice are often used to determine side-effects, benefits, and other information so that scientists have some idea about how the same research might work on humans (though it doesn't always work). This idea is used in the story.


Algernon had the same operation that Charlie had. The scientists have observed Algernon becoming more and more intelligent over time. By the time Charlie is reaching his peak, Algernon is beginning to regress, and now that Charlie is so highly intelligent, he notices this. He watches Algernon become depressed and refuse to run the mazes. He watches Algernon as he loses interest in everything, and finally Charlie watches as Algernon dies. Charlie knows that his fate is tied up with Algernon's, so he begins his own research, hoping to find an answer and a cure. Sadly, that doesn't happen, and Charlie's own regression soon begins.


When Algernon dies, Charlie buries him and puts flowers on his grave--thus the name of the story. This also symbolizes the connection between Algernon and Charlie.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more