Skip to main content

Was it right to look at the subject from the perspective of a young, naïve boy in John Boyne's novel The Boy in Striped Pajamas?

Whether or not it was "right" to tell this story with a young boy as the focus is really a matter of opinion, so I cannot answer that question for you. However, I do think that The Boy in the Striped Pajamas ("Pyjamas" in the UK) makes an important point and does it very well. So much of history seems to belong solely to adults. Children are often left out of historical documents and accounts, and so are often left out of historical fiction as well. The truth is that there were children involved in the Holocaust, and entire families were shaken up by the events on all sides. 


The protagonist, Bruno, is a powerful character because he is rather oblivious (as most children are) to what his parents do and what the strange place beyond his fence really is. He has just moved to a new home and naturally is in want of friendship, so when he meets Shmuel, he makes good effort to befriend him. Shmuel and Bruno are mirrors of each other, sharing the same birthday, but they live very different lives on their respective sides of the fence. This character dynamic shows a stark contrast between the lives of those who benefited under the Nazi regime and those who were punished. It is all the more powerful for telling a story about those who are often left out of our discussions of history-- children.


Bruno and Shmuel have all of the curiosity, love, and confusion childhood offers. Their story is one of the commonplace but undiscussed circumstances such trusting and adventurous children were forced into during the time of the Holocaust.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more