Skip to main content

Given the decline of extended family influence and other developments described in Mothers and Others, what does the changing nature of American...

According to Hrdy, as elaborated upon in her conclusion, advancing technological society has caused splintering of child-rearing support groups. These groups of related or nearly-related individuals are identified as alloparenting and allomothering groups. This splintering has resulted in changes to child-rearing, leaving human young with few individuals to identify with, be empathetic with and mind read with. The consequence of this change in child-rearing culture is already traceable in the diminishment of qualities that are distinctly, definitively human, a claim Hrdy backs up with contemporary studies. 


Further loss of these qualities due to, as Hrdy says, rapid continuing human evolution wherein traits that are not used are lost may lead to a future of humans who lack the altruistic, intersubjective qualities that make our species empathetic, mind-reading, and collaborative--that make us, as we now define it, human. Some of these losses would be to such qualities as these:


  • mind reading

  • empathy and compassion

  • intimacy

  • giving rituals

  • altruism

  • collaboration

The loss of these qualities in the evolutionary process would result in humans who are still human, but would they be "human in ways we now think of as distinguishing our species—that is, empathetic and curious about the emotions of others, shaped by our ancient heritage of communal care"?


In Hrdy's view and in my own, such intimate identification as comes from the development of intense mind reading and collaboration makes a woman's mother a better alloparent than her mother-in-law. In alloparenting, the greater affinity of a mother to a close blood relative (kin) than to a marriage relative (near-kin) may suggest that collaboration is limited to groups and individuals closely bound by empathy, intense mind-reading affinities, intense interest in and caring about the others' thoughts, and to those who are gift-givers rather than taking-competitors.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more