Skip to main content

Who is "their" when it says, "Their behavoir connected to Fitzgerald's commentary on the American Dream"?

You would need to confirm with your teacher or whomever assigned the original question, but it is most likely referring to Gatsby and Nick.  These are two characters who, despite seemingly having everything and doing what society expected of them, were not fulfilled and did not earn their individual "American Dream" at the end of the novel. 


Gatsby rises from the child of poor farmers in the midwest to a man everyone recognizes in New York City.  He throws extravagant parties and has an excessive amount of money, but none of that is enough to get him what he truly desires. On the surface, that desire seems to be Daisy, but as the novel progresses, the reader realizes that Daisy is more than just a woman to Gatsby: she represents youth and beauty and everything he couldn't have when he was poor. At the end of the novel, he loses Daisy and his life when he's forced to confront the idea that Daisy cannot be everything he needs and wants her to be. He dies still clinging to the idea of Daisy and the false illusion that she loves him.


Nick, the narrator, is different in that he is clearly disillusioned with the idea of the American Dream at the end of the novel. He sees Tom and Daisy for what they are, reckless human beings, and retreats back to the midwest, where morality hasn't loosened so much. He must rethink his American Dream and what it means to be happy altogether, because he isn't willing to give up his humanity to be like Tom and Daisy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.