Skip to main content

Some argue that cause-related marketing is merely a way for for-profit companies to sell products and trick customers into feeling as though their...

Cause related marketing (CRM) is an advertisement campaign where companies link products with social causes.  The effect is to convince the consumer the product is a win-win.  The consumer gets the products and the company provides some compensation towards the social cause.  However, disreputable companies may use CRM to advertise inferior products or fail to deliver on the promise of support to the cause.


CRM has been around since the mid-1970s, although it has surely been around for much longer without formal recognition.  The goal is two-fold for the company.  First, by tying a product to a social cause the company hopes to increase sales beyond the cost of supporting the cause, thereby earning a profit.  Secondly, the company is seeking to connect the franchise name with charitable works and gain market share via positive association.  The consumer is expecting to receive a product they would most likely purchase anyway with the benefit of supporting a social cause.  When the two viewpoints meet, there can be a very positive impact for consumer, company and social cause.


Cause related marketing has the potential for marrying social justice with consumerism and having a positive impact on each.  Companies engaging in social related marketing are oftentimes preying on social pressures to guilt or shame consumers into purchases rather than encouraging them by offering a superior product.  However, some consumers may purchase the product not as a secondary purpose, but with the primary goal of supporting a social cause they do not feel comfortable supporting in a direct manner.  The arrangement certainly has potential for good, but the temptation for abuse is high. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.