The Industrial Revolution made countries powerful in the 1900's. In many respects, the Industrial Revolution was a separator between powerful states and ones that would woefully lag behind. Geography and political stability were important factors in whether a country could industrialize or not. Countries that saw an increase in manufacturing because of the utilization of machines were advantaged in a number of ways. First, it was easier to mass produce weapons that were on the cutting edge of battlefield technology. Second, the increase in wealth, and by extension, tax revenues allowed industrialized nations to invest in their defense industries. A third reason that industrialization made nations powerful is because it helped them to expand their empires. Industrialized nations looked to other lands to acquire natural resources and markets. These lands provided both economic and military benefits to those nations.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment