Skip to main content

What is one psychological reason, supported by the text, that Hamlet was unable to act on his task for revenge?

When the troupe of actors comes to Elsinore and Hamlet begins to conceive of his plan to have them act out a play that is similar in its plot to the way his father was killed by his uncle (or so a ghost in the shape of his father would have him believe), Hamlet reveals one psychological reason why he has not acted on the ghost's charge to exact revenge so far: doubt. He says,



I'll observe [my uncle's] looks
I'll tent him to the quick. If he do blench,
I know my course. The spirit that I have seen
May be a devil, and the devil hath power
T' assume a pleasing shape (Act II, Scene 2, lines 625-629).



Hamlet worries that the spirit he saw on the ramparts was not actually his father. It is possible that the ghost is not really the spirit of his father at all and that it is actually the devil, come to persuade Hamlet to do something evil and so ruin his own soul in the process. If he can get Claudius to reveal his guilt, then Hamlet will know for sure that he was his father's killer, eliminate all his doubts, and allow him to move forward with his revenge. This is why he orders this play to be performed and why he keeps such a close eye on his uncle the whole time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.