Skip to main content

In The Swiss Family Robinson, what is the setting of the first campsite the family makes?

Although there is nothing specific mentioned in the novel about the location of the family's first campsite, there are some clues that lead one to believe they probably camped on the beach close to where they landed. The text tells us that as soon as they landed, the family



set about finding a suitable place to erect a tent in which to pass the night. This [they] speedily did; thrusting a long spar into a hole in the rock, and supporting the other end by a pole firmly planted in the ground, [they] formed a framework over which [they] stretched the sailcloth [they] had brought; besides fastening this down with pegs, [they] placed our heavy chests and boxes on the border of the canvas, and arranged hooks so as to be able to close up the entrance during the night. (Wyss, 1812, Ch. 1, para. 81)



There are a couple of clues here that indicate the family camped close to where they landed. First, we are told they found their set-up spot "speedily." This would not have been the case had they had to wander the island looking for a suitable spot. We are also told they placed one of the support poles into a hole in a rock, which tells us they were probably still close to the rocky coast that is described a bit earlier in the text. Last, we are told they secured the flaps of the tent with the heavy chests and boxes they had brought with them. We are not told that they lugged those heavy items over any distance or with much effort, so again, we can assume they camped close to where they landed. 


Another clue comes shortly after when our narrator tells us that he was looking for a place to pull a couple of casks ashore but "found that [he] could not get them up the bank on which [they] had landed" (Wyss, 1812, Ch 1, para. 89). He also tells us that "Fritz, leaving a loaded gun with me, took another himself, and went along the rough coast to see what lay beyond the stream; this fatiguing sort of walk not suiting Ernest's fancy, he sauntered down to the beach, and Jack scrambled among the rocks searching for shellfish" (para. 88). This stream is mentioned again just a few paragraphs later when Fritz returns to the campsite and tells everyone that he has ventured beyond the stream and found a lovely spot for a possible more permanent campsite (para. 118). Our narrator has not gone very far, and Fritz leaves the campsite to walk the coast. Because we are also told that Ernest doesn't want to walk so far, he saunters down to the beach, which is indicative of the beach being within easy walking distance. This is reinforced when our narrator tells us that Jack, too, the youngest, is crawling around the rocks and the tidal pools. These all point to the family's campsite being very close to where they landed.


Finally, early in Ch. 2, we are told the family wakes after a comfortable sleep and one of the first orders of business is to further explore the island. To that end, it was decided " that, as soon as [they] had breakfasted, Fritz and [our narrator] should start on an expedition with these objects in view, while [his] wife remained near [their] landing- place with the three younger boys" (Wyss, 1812, para. 3). Here, we are told as clearly as it gets that the campsite is close to where they landed.


So although we are never told expressly where the family first made camp, there are ample clues that allow us to assume they stay close to where they landed, a safe distance from the water's edge, on the beach side of a stream.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...