Skip to main content

Difference between direct democracy and indirect democracy

An indirect democracy is otherwise known as a "republic" or a "representative democracy." Many countries that are well-known for their democracy, such as the United States, are actually republics and not true direct democracies.


A direct democracy is exactly how it sounds: the people cast votes, and the person with the most votes at the end of the election wins. If my ballot is counted last, and my vote determines if person A or person B wins the election, you can say that my vote "directly matters." This might seem obvious, but when it comes to republics, not all votes directly "matter."


In a republic, people vote for representatives. These are often governors, senators, representatives for the house, and other legislators. In these district elections, the votes of people "directly matter" because the candidate with the most votes wins. However, in political practices one tier above that, the common man does not get to directly vote.


Legislators and senators and the like are tasked with voting for their district. That means that your county has chosen representatives who have beliefs that match with most of yours. Thus, those representative people will vote in congress or court or wherever how you probably would have voted. This simplifies the process and allows for educated legal specialists (senators) to make educated legal decisions instead of leaving it up to you and me.


This also takes place within voting for certain offices, like the presidency. In America, there is an electoral college. That group of educated voters sits in a little office and takes a look at the ballots cast by the common people for the candidates for presidency. The electoral college people then take their votes (the ones that actually count) and cast them probably based off of the votes of their represented districts. So if everyone in Washington votes for the Democratic candidate, the electoral college for that state will cast their (actually important) votes for the Democratic candidate.


Now that is not to say that the common man's vote does not matter; if the common people did not cast their votes for office, then the electoral college would not know who the public wanted them to vote for. It's like telling your mom that you want a green scarf, but she ultimately has the decision and buying power. She might buy you the green one, but she also might see that the scarf is made of a scratchy fabric that might itch you, so she picks an orange one instead. She takes your input into account. So too does the electoral college.


So, a direct democracy allows everyone to participate in the "most votes" contest. An indirect democracy allows everyone to participate in the "most votes" contest to choose educated politicians to make the hard decisions for us.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more