Skip to main content

When Granny sees Hapsy coming into the room, others around her perceive that— a. Hapsy is actually leaving the room. b. the weather is getting...

The answer is d:
Granny hallucinates and thinks that Hapsy, who is dead, has come into the room, but it is actually Lydia, who enters.


In the fifth paragraph from the last, beginning with "Light flashed on her closed eyelids...." a deep roaring sound seems to shake Granny. She asks Cornelia if there is a storm coming because she has heard thunder, and she tells her daughter to close the windows. Then, realizing that death approaches, she asks that the children be called to her bedside. As they enter, Granny asks, "Is that you Hapsy?" "Oh no, I'm Lydia."


Hapsy, who is already dead, has been Granny's dearest and favorite child all her life. She calls from her heart for this child, because Hapsy would be her greatest comfort. "What if I don't find her?" she worries. Granny prays that God will give her a sign, but nothing happens. For Granny, this is her second jilting: "I'll never forgive it" she utters with her last sorrowful breath.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.