When Romeo first approaches Friar Lawrence, asking him to consent to marrying him and Juliet, the friar is, at first, taken aback because Romeo had professed to love Rosaline just the day before. He believes that Romeo's "love" must not really be love but lust or infatuation or something like it. However, Romeo explains that Juliet actually loves him in return and that the reason he'd been so miserable before was that Rosaline did not return his feelings. Though the Friar doesn't really believe that what Romeo feels is love, he says, "In one respect, I'll thy assistant be, / For this alliance may so happy prove / To turn your households rancor to pure love" (2.3.97-99). In other words, he agrees to marry the young couple because he is hoping that their marriage will erase the bad blood between the Capulets and Montagues and end the violent feud between these two families.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment