Skip to main content

Who discovers King Duncan's death in Macbeth?

It is Macduff who discovers King Duncan's bloody body and who sounds the alarm. Macbeth had planned to pretend to be sound asleep with his wife in their chambers when the body was discovered. But Shakespeare evidently wanted Macbeth to be present when Macduff discovered the body. This would explain the prolonged knocking which begins in Act II, Scene 2 and continues into Act II, Scene 3, when the drunken Porter finally opens the gate. By this time Macbeth feels compelled to put in an appearance to see what is going on. He arrives in time to see that it is Macduff, cold and wet, who has been making all that racket. Macbeth is still in a semi-trancelike state, brought on by his horror at having killed the King. But Macduff misinterprets Macbeth's behavior for anger at having been awakened by his knocking. Macduff offers a sort of apology when he says:



He did command me to call timely on him;
I have almost slipped the hour.



But Macbeth seems to ignore his apology when he says tersely:



I'll bring you to him.



Later Macduff will remember Macbeth's strange behavior and realize that it was Macbeth who was guilty of murdering King Duncan. Macbeth dreads having to be present when Macduff discovers the body, but now he is forced to conduct Macduff and Lennox to Duncan's bedchamber and wait outside while Macduff enters. Young Lennox tries to make casual conversation while they are waiting for Macduff to return, but Macbeth can only mutter short, distracted replies. When Macduff comes back out calling for someone to ring the alarm, Macbeth soliloquizes:



Had I but died an hour before this chance,
I had lived a blessed time; for from this instant
There's nothing serious in mortality:
All is but toys. Renown and grace is dead,
The wine of life is drawn, and the mere lees
Is left this vault to brag of.      (III.2)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more