Skip to main content

What decision does Duncan make concerning Macbeth?

Duncan decides to give Macbeth a promotion to the title thane of Cawdor. 


Duncan gets a report that Macbeth was very brave and noble in the recent battle.    The thane of Cawdor they call a “most disloyal traitor,” but Macbeth was described as brave.  The sergeant told Duncan that Macbeth “carved out his passage” and cut down the “merciless Macdonwald” in the battle.  Norway lost the battle, and Scottland won. 


Duncan’s response was to promote Macbeth. 



DUNCAN


No more that thane of Cawdor shall deceive
Our bosom interest: go pronounce his present death,
And with his former title greet Macbeth. (Act 1, Scene 2) 



Clearly, Duncan is impressed with Macbeth’s bravery and skill on the battlefield.  He knows nothing about the witches, of course.  He assumes that Macbeth will be thrilled to have been promoted to thane of Cawdor, and not be expect anything else.  Why would he?


When Macbeth finds out about his promotion, he is surprised.



MACBETH


The thane of Cawdor lives: why do you dress me
In borrow'd robes?


ANGUS


Who was the thane lives yet;
But under heavy judgment bears that life
Which he deserves to lose. … (Act 1, Scene 2) 



It is not so much happiness at the promotion that causes Macbeth to comment as curiosity at the fact that one of the prophecies came true.  Banquo also is interested in this news.  If one of these prophecies came true, might the others too? 


Alas, it is not to be. The prophecy about Macbeth being king does not immediately come true.  When Duncan's son Malcolm is named the king's successor, Macbeth is irritated. His ambition comes out.  He wanted to be king, and even though it makes sense for the king to name his son as heir, Macbeth thought that if one prophecy came true the rest should too.  Macbeth decides to make the prophecy come true one way or another, even if it means killing the king.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...