Skip to main content

What decision does Duncan make concerning Macbeth?

Duncan decides to give Macbeth a promotion to the title thane of Cawdor. 


Duncan gets a report that Macbeth was very brave and noble in the recent battle.    The thane of Cawdor they call a “most disloyal traitor,” but Macbeth was described as brave.  The sergeant told Duncan that Macbeth “carved out his passage” and cut down the “merciless Macdonwald” in the battle.  Norway lost the battle, and Scottland won. 


Duncan’s response was to promote Macbeth. 



DUNCAN


No more that thane of Cawdor shall deceive
Our bosom interest: go pronounce his present death,
And with his former title greet Macbeth. (Act 1, Scene 2) 



Clearly, Duncan is impressed with Macbeth’s bravery and skill on the battlefield.  He knows nothing about the witches, of course.  He assumes that Macbeth will be thrilled to have been promoted to thane of Cawdor, and not be expect anything else.  Why would he?


When Macbeth finds out about his promotion, he is surprised.



MACBETH


The thane of Cawdor lives: why do you dress me
In borrow'd robes?


ANGUS


Who was the thane lives yet;
But under heavy judgment bears that life
Which he deserves to lose. … (Act 1, Scene 2) 



It is not so much happiness at the promotion that causes Macbeth to comment as curiosity at the fact that one of the prophecies came true.  Banquo also is interested in this news.  If one of these prophecies came true, might the others too? 


Alas, it is not to be. The prophecy about Macbeth being king does not immediately come true.  When Duncan's son Malcolm is named the king's successor, Macbeth is irritated. His ambition comes out.  He wanted to be king, and even though it makes sense for the king to name his son as heir, Macbeth thought that if one prophecy came true the rest should too.  Macbeth decides to make the prophecy come true one way or another, even if it means killing the king.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more