Skip to main content

Explain how Miller uses symbolic actions and figurative language to communicate the state of the Proctors' relationship at the beginning of Act 2...

At the beginning of this act, the audience sees John Proctor go behind his wife's back to season her stew, and he then later tells her that t is "well-seasoned."  This action seems symbolic of John's lack of honesty with his wife, Elizabeth.  He doesn't want to hurt her feelings or cause any more negative feeling between them, and so he tells a white lie in order to give himself an opportunity to compliment her.  She catches him in a similarly small lie later in this scene, as he'd told her previously that he was never alone with Abigail when he went into town, and now he mentions that they were alone for a moment when Abigail told him that it wasn't witchcraft that caused Betty Parris's illness.  He likely told the small lie in order, again, to prevent more awkwardness and distrust between them, but when Elizabeth finds out that he lied, it makes him seem even less trustworthy.


Further, John uses a simile when he says that "It's warm as blood beneath the clods."  This could, perhaps, symbolize that despite Elizabeth and John's somewhat distant and chilly demeanor toward one another, they still very much love each other warmly beneath that surface coldness.  John also uses a metaphor when he describes their farm as a "continent when you go foot by foot droppin' seeds in it."  He thus emphasizes the tiresome work that he's been doing, much like the tiresome work he's been doing for the last seven months, trying to earn Elizabeth's forgiveness and trust again.  He can only do a little thing here, a little thing there, and it is taking forever.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.