Skip to main content

What does political tragedy mean?

Political tragedies are a sub-category of tragedy as a whole.  A tragedy is a form of drama where the misfortunes of the protagonist are examined and presented to the audience.  Iliad and Odyssey are two of the classic Greek tragedies.  The focus is on the heroes of the respective poems, Achilles and Odysseus, and the tragic circumstances they face, largely through no fault of their own.


A political tragedy, as a working definition, is a tragedy whereupon the drama which unfolds poses a question of moral validity relevant to the audience. In his book The Political Shape of Tragedy, D.M. Carter defines a political tragedy as "a concern with human beings as part of the community of the polis." A political tragedy is one where the drama addresses some moral question to the audience.


Ajax, written by Sophocles around 442 BC, focuses on several moral themes surrounding Ajax as the main character. He believes he should wear Achilles's armor, but it was given to Odysseus. This provides the audience with the first conundrum; who should rightfully wear the armor? As retribution, Ajax goes on to slaughter many in the Greek army, including cattle and innocent civilians. Is revenge in this manner acceptable? Ajax eventually realizes his error and commits suicide. The third of the moral questions is developed here. Ajax's body is then fought over, posing the question of how enemies should be treated.


The political tragedy focuses on the hardships of Ajax, but each instance of despair is paired with a moral question upon which the audience may think. The political questions of the day are much the same then as they are today. Movies from Hollywood continue to introduce political tragedy by injecting various levels of morality into plot lines. The ancient Greeks also did this, developing the political tragedy as a way to dramatize the morally relevant questions posed on any society. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.