Skip to main content

What does political tragedy mean?

Political tragedies are a sub-category of tragedy as a whole.  A tragedy is a form of drama where the misfortunes of the protagonist are examined and presented to the audience.  Iliad and Odyssey are two of the classic Greek tragedies.  The focus is on the heroes of the respective poems, Achilles and Odysseus, and the tragic circumstances they face, largely through no fault of their own.


A political tragedy, as a working definition, is a tragedy whereupon the drama which unfolds poses a question of moral validity relevant to the audience. In his book The Political Shape of Tragedy, D.M. Carter defines a political tragedy as "a concern with human beings as part of the community of the polis." A political tragedy is one where the drama addresses some moral question to the audience.


Ajax, written by Sophocles around 442 BC, focuses on several moral themes surrounding Ajax as the main character. He believes he should wear Achilles's armor, but it was given to Odysseus. This provides the audience with the first conundrum; who should rightfully wear the armor? As retribution, Ajax goes on to slaughter many in the Greek army, including cattle and innocent civilians. Is revenge in this manner acceptable? Ajax eventually realizes his error and commits suicide. The third of the moral questions is developed here. Ajax's body is then fought over, posing the question of how enemies should be treated.


The political tragedy focuses on the hardships of Ajax, but each instance of despair is paired with a moral question upon which the audience may think. The political questions of the day are much the same then as they are today. Movies from Hollywood continue to introduce political tragedy by injecting various levels of morality into plot lines. The ancient Greeks also did this, developing the political tragedy as a way to dramatize the morally relevant questions posed on any society. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...