Iago is almost entirely responsible for Othello's downfall. From beginning to end, Iago orchestrates the entire dastardly scheme that brings about Othello's disgrace and demise, starting with the alienation of Cassio, Othello's trusted lieutenant. After humiliating Cassio, Iago begins convincing Othello that Cassio and Desdemona are having an affair, a claim bolstered by his famous handkerchief trick (another deception fueled by Iago's machinations). Finally, wrongly convinced that Desdemona is involved with Cassio, Othello kills her. Once he discovers his error, Othello kills himself. This tragic series of events is caused by Iago's deception, so he can be seen as the primary cause of Othello's downfall. Indeed, much of the play focuses on Iago's construction of his vile plan, and the nature of his scheming is both fascinating and disturbing. As such, the play not only focuses on Othello's tragic end, but also on the way Iago causes it through his elaborate deception.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment