Skip to main content

In the story "After Twenty Years" by O. Henry, does the narrator reveal the inner thoughts of any of the characters?

The narrator in "After Twenty Years" does not reveal the inner thoughts of any of the characters. What is remarkable about this story is its strict objectivity. The reader is only told what the characters say and do. It is only in retrospect, after finishing the story, that the reader can understand what the three characters, Jimmy Wells, 'Silky' Bob, and the unnamed plainclothes detective, must have been thinking. For example, Bob must have been thinking that he looked suspicious standing back in the unlighted doorway of a closed hardware shop in a nearly deserted neighborhood. That would explain why he acted so candidly and openly when the uniformed cop stopped in front of him--and it might even explain why he decided to light his fresh cigar. In doing so, he evidently intended to show that this was why he was standing in the doorway. It would be too wet and windy to light a cigar out in the open. But in lighting his cigar, Bob revealed his face, and this would lead to his downfall. Jimmy must have changed his mind about introducing himself as Bob's old friend and decided it was his duty to have Bob arrested. There was a lot of mental activity going on in the story, but it is not revealed to the reader because of the objective, "journalistic" style of the narrative. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...