Skip to main content

What made King Duncan from Macbeth such a fair king?

While King Duncan doesn't live for very long in Shakespeare's Macbeth, his fairness is clearly established.  Firstly, he is a very kind, benevolent ruler who rewards those who are loyal to him.  In Act I, Scene 2, when told by the wounded Captain of Macbeth's valor in battle, Duncan immediately sends word to reward "worthy" Macbeth for his actions, promoting him to Thane of Cawdor, and even sending the wounded Captain off with attendants to receive the medical aid he requires.

Secondly, Duncan is a very trusting king.  He understands the problems with this, stating in Act 1, Scene 4 that he trusted the former Thane of Cawdor too much, and lamenting that "There's no art/ To find the mind's construction in the face."  While he is aware of how this worldview can lead to problems, he treats Macbeth with a great level of trust rather than become suspicious that Macbeth, too, could become treacherous.  Though this leads to his demise, Duncan shows he is willing to risk harm rather than to distrust those that have shown him nothing but loyalty.

Finally, Duncan shows kindness and generosity to all in his service.  He rewards Banquo for his service, promotes Malcolm to Prince of Cumberland, and even sends a jewel to Lady Macbeth for being such a welcoming hostess to him during his visit.  Even the level of guilt that the Macbeths suffer after murdering him is reflective of his kindness and fairness.  Had he been a lesser person, they probably wouldn't have felt as terrible about the act.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more