Skip to main content

Do you think Mary Maloney is right in what she does in Lamb to the Slaughter by Roald Dahl?

It is up to you how you want to answer this question.  My opinion is not any more correct than your opinion.  The important thing will be to defend your answer.  


No, I do not think that Mary Maloney was right or justified in what she did.  She killed her husband.  Whether it was intentional or not does not change the fact that she smashed her husband's skull in by smacking him in the head with a blunt object.   She killed her husband plain and simple.  In addition to killing her husband, she deviously found a way to get away with the crime.   Mary figured out a way to give herself an alibi for the crime, and she even managed to destroy the murder weapon when she had the police officers eat it.  I understand that Mary was attempting to guard her unborn child, but that doesn't mean she has a free pass on killing people.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.